Perchlorate debate percolating

first_imgLocal water quality officials believe a national standard will help agencies get more money from the federal government for cleanup. However, at last week’s hearing, an EPA official said that more study is needed in order to determine whether perchlorate in drinking water should be regulated at the federal level. “We need to determine whether setting a drinking water standard would provide a meaningful opportunity to reduce risk for people served by public water systems,” George Gray, assistant administrator for the EPA’s Office of Research and Development, told the House Subcommittee on Environment and Hazardous Materials. Gray said that it is still unclear how much perchlorate exposure comes from food, as opposed to water. But Dr. Anila Jacob of the Environmental Working Group said a series of studies by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have put to rest the debate over the health risks of perchlorate. “These studies establish that exposure to perchlorate is widespread and that levels of perchlorate found in people are associated with significant decreases in thyroid hormone levels,” said Jacob, senior scientist for the Washington-based environmental group. [email protected] (626) 962-8811, Ext. 2306 160Want local news?Sign up for the Localist and stay informed Something went wrong. Please try again.subscribeCongratulations! You’re all set! Environmental Protection Agency officials are balking at plans to set a national cleanup standard for perchlorate, a toxic rocket fuel additive that abounds in the nation’s drinking-water supply – including the San Gabriel Valley’s. The EPA’s comments came during a House hearing last week attended by Rep. Hilda Solis, D-El Monte. Solis has proposed H.R. 1747, a bill that would require the EPA to enact a mandatory minimum level of perchlorate in drinking water within 2 1/2 years. The EPA already has a guideline of 24.5 parts per billion as a recommended safe dose for perchlorate, but it has yet to set any mandatory limit for the chemical in drinking water. California is considering setting the limit at six parts per billion, a standard currently being used by many state water agencies. One part per billion is equivalent to about a half-teaspoon of the chemical in an Olympic-size swimming pool. last_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *